Program
Investigation #1
Program Title: The First
Tee, Level II Coaches Training
Program Dates: January
24-26, 2014
Program Location:
Houston, Texas
Learner
Population:
44
Learner Overview
Adult volunteer coaches and Level I
coaches from throughout The First Tee western region of
the United States gathered to acquire
Level II coaching status within The First Tee network. Coaches
came from diverse chapters that
included a variety of demographics and total numbers of participants.
Purposes
and Objectives
Coaches sought to obtain further learning regarding The First Tee
Life-Skills Experience curriculum, as well as the Golf-Skills
curriculum. Learner objectives specifically focused on the variance
between learner-oriented and teacher-oriented lessons, as well as
experiential learning from the perspective of the participant.
Coaches sought to have a better understanding of body language, vocal
cadence, safety procedures, lesson planning, and life-skill bridges
to golf-skills.
Program
Design
Day
One:
Coaches began the training experience by introducing themselves and
their respective chapters to help build camaraderie. An overview of
the next two days was then given to assist in their self-preparation
for the coming tasks. From there, individuals were broken up into
teams to further grow camaraderie and to help introduce a competitive
influence to the remainder of the training. Teams were tasked with
coming up with a team name and then given a training leader to be
their team captain.
Exercise 1, Simulated Programming Rotation
Teams
were challenged to adopt the mindset of a young participant as they
circulated through a typical set of five stations. The purpose of
this exercise was to allow learners an experiential learning
environment that changed their perspective so as to recognize how a
participant views the programming process. Following the rotation,
learners would congregate and discuss what the facilitators did
positively, and in what ways they felt neglected or unengaged.
Aspects such as body language, vocal cues, vocal cadence, and safety
precautions were reviewed immediately following the exercise while
fresh in their minds. This proved to allow a full understanding of
the programming environment.
Exercise 2, Learner-Oriented vs. Teacher-Oriented Debate
The next exercise challenged teams to debate against one another.
The topic of the debate was that learning is experienced versus
learning is taught. The purpose behind this exercise was for adult
participants to recognize that there is a blend between learning
processes. Initially, the trainees are tasked with arguing their
team's side, trying to win the debate. Ultimately, the merits of
both aspects are given resonance and the learner values experiential
learning to be as valid as formal teaching methods.
Exercise 3, Program Lesson Plan Creation
Next, teams were tasked with creating a unique lesson plan that
implements life-skills, e.g. self-management or interpersonal skills,
with golf-skills. How these skills were learned were to be via a
blend of the experiential learning and facilitator led teaching.
Each team was to come up with at least three activity-based stations
that encompassed these two learning methods. Clear description was
to be given as to how each station would engage the participant,
along with a list of sample questions for coaches to ask in order for
the learner to discover realizations on their own.
Exercise 4, Lesson Plan Implementation
On day two of the training, each adult team would present their
finalized lesson plan to a group of 15-20 youth participants.
Trainers observed the teams to grade implementation of skills such as
learner focused, body language, activity-based, and bridges to
life-skills. This quick turnaround from the theoretical approach of
day one, to the real life implementation on day two served to be a
valuable learning experience for the trainees. Immediately following
the programming, participants engaged in a “good, better, how”
where they reviewed the day for positives and areas for improvement.
Main Features of
Experiential Learning within the Program Investigation
Reviewing this program under the lens of experiential learning
yields a number of truths. In regards to main ideas identified
within the literature review of this theory, let us first examine
reflective practice. Following each exercise, immediate reviews were
held so that learners good identify positive experiences and the
emotions attached to them. These experiences and emotions were
allowed to be immediately relayed into practical usage in the final
exercise.
Secondly, pertaining to distinguishing value, each exercise was
designed to have the trainees recognize the value of how they present
themselves and the program itself. Whether it was recognizing that
kneeling makes them more approachable to young children, or that
continuous positive affirmation helps to keep the children engaged,
they were able to witness the valuable results firsthand. This no
doubt left a more distinguishable effect on them then simply reading
these tips off of a powerpoint. Moreover, everything was brought
back to the greater objective of positive youth development, which
gave the trainees a sense of ownership in bettering their community.
Thirdly, in acknowledging the fluidity of knowledge, trainees were
aided in recognizing that how one child adapts to their experience is
different from how two or three others may react. This appreciation
was vital for them to experientially witness the different mechanisms
that assist one child versus the other. Trainees spoke to this
specifically, noting that witnessing how each child reacts uniquely,
and how transitioning terminology or their modeling can aid in the
child's overall comprehension.
Finally, in understanding that educators require flexibility, the
trainees were able to exercise various delivery methods in the final
exercise so that the participants had the best opportunity for
successful comprehension. In exercise two, the trainees were
required to explore how learning is both experiential and
traditionally presented through direct teaching. This exercise aided
them in appreciating the need for the learner to be the ultimate
decision maker, and to essentially guide the teacher/facilitator in
dictating the best method for success.
Practical Application
These features serve to remind me of how versatile I need to be in
my approach to adult education. Just recently I began a new position
as Community Outreach Director. As I try to expand our organization
within different schools and like-minded nonprofits, I consistently
review the experience of the learners currently in our program to
figure out what is working versus what needs modifying. Moreover,
when trying to persuade school leaders and directors in adopting our
curriculum, I allow them to witness our programming and see the value
system inherent in our curriculum. Furthermore, I place emphasis on
our coaches' acceptance of all learning styles and levels of
capability. I walk them through our building blocks, so that they
see that our coaches are trained in a variety of teaching
methodologies in order to equate success. All totaled, the main
features of this training program relate heavily to how I am able to
convince others that experiential learning can truly transform
individuals into better citizens within their community.
Table 2. Summary of Investigation
Main Program Features
|
Investigation #1 (John Murray)
|
Applications
|
|
Consistent Review
|
Each exercise involved had consistent, thorough review of
the experience
|
Utilization of immediate feedback
|
|
Value Recognition
|
Each exercise required participants to search for
the value learned
|
Attachment of value for prolonged memory of the learned material
|
|
Learner Variance
|
Exercises aided adult educators in appreciating
their learners' different learning styles
|
Allowance for wider learner availability and tolerance
|
|
Educator Flexibility
|
Exercises focused on assisting the adult learner in
noticing the need for flexible approaches in their methodology
|
More proactive teaching approaches by quickly recognizing a need for transition of methods
|
I have never thought about learning styles impacting coaching. I take tennis lessons and one of the girls I play with is deaf in one ear. During class three I knew she still had not mentioned it to the coach and I could see his frustration that she wasn't always doing what he was telling us to. Then, she told him and they way he has communicated with her since then has been so much better. However, he didn't know to coach her differently until he was aware of the impairment. I think that the body language, vocal cadence, etc. is so important in all communication and makes sense in coaching or otherwise. I enjoyed your Program Investigation.
ReplyDeleteI found this to be a very interesting topic. I like the way the program was set up and the methods that it used. I would love to participate in a workshop like this, I think that it would be a great experience. I thought the exercise on how learning is experienced versus being taught to be eye opening. I will have to develop an exercise for my classes to take advantage of this.
ReplyDelete